Showing posts with label Broadway Eyesore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Broadway Eyesore. Show all posts

Thursday, August 05, 2010

THE FUTURE OF KINGS INN?

I have said all too many times that the residents of the City of Kingston should stop resisting the notion that we are indeed a city. If we are to start building our tax base while adding quality office and residential space, we have to build UP.

If you click on the Kings Inn above, you'll get an idea of what I think should be a goal for this site. Whether the public or governing body agree with me is outside of my knowledge at this time. But if we are to put out an RFP to any developers who may be interested, show them this option and see who steps up to the plate.

Feel free to imagine different styles and building materials, but the general idea is to think and act like a city. Thoughts?

Friday, April 04, 2008

ACTION AT 672 BROADWAY



Have you noticed? There is a sign of life at 672 Broadway.
After sitting dormant for years and sustaining the negative appearance of midtown, the dumpster is gone and the owners are finally doing something.


Nat Collins, a partner with 672 Broadway Partners LLC, purchased the building from the city in February 2004, with plans for a mix of apartments and commercial space.


I had pushed the planning department to engage the reverter clause on this building back in 2006, after showing no signs of renovation since the demolition. My intent was to offer the building to the LGBTQ Center which has since found a better home on Wall St. This would have been a huge undertaking to renovate from a non-profit perspective, but my pursuit got the current owner back to the table.


In his plea, Nat Collins stated: "Since the demolition job, some work on the exterior of the building, has been completed," he said. "Unfortunately, due to some delays in securing financing, the time allowed under the reverter clause as specified in the deed had expired."


In an old Freeman article: Mayor James Sottile, said “The city must convey a strong message that buyers of surplus city property must act swiftly to complete projects and get the properties back on the tax rolls”. He was so right!


So here we are in 2008, and we finally see some action. Granted it’s nothing spectacular, but keep in mind…Nat Collins is associated with “Sailor’s Cove”, the development on the Hudson River.....What impression does it give to us Councilmen when someone projects this fundamental image of workmanship and timetables on a future development project with 500 homes?